Go Back
Magazine

Paris+ par Art Basel

ArtBasel is expanding its horizons yet again

News
News
Paris+ par Art Basel
Grace Cangiano

Grace Cangiano

Date
December 4, 2022
Read
1 Min

ArtBasel is expanding its horizons yet again. After a public competition last yearby the Réunion des Musées Nationaux, Art Basel and its parent company MCH Groupwere awarded a seven-year contract to direct the contemporary and modern artfair at the Grand Palais in Paris. The project aims to facilitate connectionswith France’s cultural industries, from fashion and design to film and music,by creating an event that enlivens and enriches its host city and willestablish its position in the Parisian cultural scene. Outgoing Global DirectorMarc Spiegler explained that “with its incomparable history and contemporarydynamism, Paris is uniquely positioned as a pivotal epicenter of theinternational cultural scene. We aim to build on Paris’s unparalleled standingas a global metropolis to help create a vibrant week that even furtheramplifies the city’s international resonance as a cultural capital.”

 

DespiteArt Basel’s enthusiasm, there was some French push-back against the Swisstakeover of a weekend that traditionally belonged to Foire Internationaled’Art Contemporain (FIAC), France’s flagship contemporary and modern art fairfor the past half century. Prominent figures of the French art world expressedconcern that this exhibition would simply become another outpost for the ArtBasel brand, which has stamped its logo on a great number of cities already. Inan effort to make the fair more French (and less Art Basel), they decided onthe name ‘Paris+’ (pronounced ‘Paree ploos’), which is also a nod to theall-encompassing approach to Parisian culture Marc Spiegler hoped to representat the fair.

 

Notwithstandingthe French resistance, it seems the inaugural exhibition was a success. Lastweek, from October 20th to 23rd, 40,000 visitors flocked to the Grand Palais Éphémère (a temporary stand-infor the Grand Palais which is under construction until 2024) to visitexhibitions from 156 leading galleries representing 30 countries.Although gallerists conceded that the Art Basel approach felt more corporatewith less of the Parisian charm of FIAC, New York art dealer David Zwirmernoted that FIAC had “tended to underperform” for his gallery. Acknowledging the limitedspace of the Grand Palais Éphémère, Paris+opted for quality over quantity. They invited a smaller number of galleries andinstead focused on presenting truly exceptional works by key artists thathadn’t been seen at Frieze London the week before. Paris+ also highlightedemerging galleries, dedicating a central space to 16 risingdealerships and discounting the participants’ booth fees by 50%.

 

We’ll see what happens at next year’sParis+ !

Latest Posts

April 22, 2026
Features
Features
Mäqdäla 1868: Decolonizing the Victoria and Albert Museum One Crown at a Time

When a group of Ethiopian artifacts went on special display at the V&A in 2018, they reopened an 11-year debate about the state of these objects and their repatriation. As the V&A faced mounting pressure to confront its colonial legacy over the return of the Mäqdäla Crown—an artifact bound to a defining moment in Anglo-Ethiopian history. Adapted from a seminar paper the author wrote for HIST0150K: Curators, Hoarders, and Looters during the Spring 2024 semester at Brown University.

April 22, 2026
News
News
Leonardo and Raphael’s “Furry Friends”: Renaissance Portraits of Women with Animals

As the Metropolitan Museum of Art opens its newest exhibition on Raphael’s works, Alexandra reflects on his piece Portrait of Young Woman with Unicorn alongside Leonardo da Vinci’s Lady with an Ermine. In particular, she considers symbolism of animals and the relationship between technology and visual analysis.

April 16, 2026
Features
Features
From Pop Irony to Political Crisis: The Culture Wars and the Breakdown of Warholian Detachment

The Culture Wars of the eighties saw a struggle for dominance between queer rights and conservatism. Campbell considers how prominent artists at the time pursued confrontational thematizations of queerness that destabilized public consensus on sexuality, race, and religion, transforming art into a confrontational political battleground.